Παρουσίαση :Φορητός νεφελοποιητής Storm

[aeolian]

aeolian αυτή εδω http://www.a-store.gr/spiti-kipos/mpatar...-fortistes ultrafire  ειναι και αυτή για τον ατμιστή  η να παρω μια samsung  που την εχεις βαλει και στην συγκριση πιο πανω απο τα καταστ'ηματα γερμανος και οκ?

μακριά από κινέζικες 18650 (ultrafire ,superfire,roulafire,koulafire,soulafire,κτλ ).
---------------------------------------------------

και μια ενδιαφέρουσα πρόσφατη έρευνα...

σημ.: το air έχει παρόμοιο τρόπο λειτουργίας με το solo ,
αν όχι ολόιδιο ...


medicinal cannabis: in vitro validation of vaporizers for the smoke-free inhalation of cannabis

" conclusions

more and more interest has been directed towards the medical use of cannabis in the treatment or alleviation of a variety of symptoms in various diseases. as the oral administration of cannabinoids reveals poor and unreliable bioavailability and smoking of cannabis cannot be recommended for medical purposes, alternative efficient and less harmful application modes are needed. vaporization of cannabis without the formation of potentially toxic pyrolysis products appears to be such an alternative. in this study, we performed an in vitro validation of 4 electrical and 1 gas-powered vaporizers regarding their ability to release thc and cbd with the vapor. the electrically-driven devices, enabling a precise control of the temperature, showed an almost complete decarboxylation of the acidic cannabinoids thca-a and cbda and good to excellent recoveries of the neutral cannabinoids thc and cbd in the vapor. indications of combustion of cannabis, e.g. ash left in the sample compartment and visible smoke, was only found in the case of the gas-powered vape-or-smoke™. in addition, with this vaporizer unreliable decarboxylation and vaporization of cannabinoids was observed as a result of lacking temperature control. therefore, gas-powered devices cannot be recommended for therapeutic purposes. relative amounts of neutral cannabinoids released into the vapor varied considerably between the 4 electrically-driven devices. the largest difference was seen for thc vaporized from thc-type cannabis with 54.6% and 82.7% for the davinci vaporizer® and the arizer solo®, respectively. here, the yield differed by 50% between the device with the lowest and that with the highest vaporizing efficiency. lowest recoveries between 48.5–58.5% for cannabinoids from cannabis were obtained with the davinci vaporizer® and the volcano medic®, whereas the plenty vaporizer® released 56.1–66.8% of total cannabinoids into the vapor. best recoveries were obtained for the arizer solo® with 70.0–82.7%. the better the recovery the less drug (cannabis or cannabinoids) is needed to deliver a defined therapeutic dose to a patient. this is an economic issue in terms of cost-effectiveness of the therapy with medicinal cannabis. another aspect is the reliable and constant release of cannabinoids into the vapor to guarantee uniformity of the dosage, reflected by the rsd values obtained for the different devices. all electrically-driven vaporizers showed small variabilities with rsd values ≤ 13%. excellent reproducibility was found for the plenty vaporizer® (rsd ≤ 6.5%). it is also important to note that the design of the vaporizers had an impact on the yield of cannabinoids released with the vapor. devices such as volcano medic® and plenty vaporizer® providing rather cold vapor for a mild, less airways-irritating inhalation revealed a smaller recovery of cannabinoids in the vapor compared to arizer solo®. however, this device, designed to release a maximum amount of cannabinoids into the vapor and lacking a cooling tube, produces a rather hot vapor, which may be less tolerated by patients.

in summary, the 4 electrically-driven and temperature-controlled vaporizers investigated in this study efficiently decarboxylate acidic cannabinoids and release reliably the corresponding neutral cannabinoids into the vapor.
therefore, they can be considered as a promising application mode for the safe and efficient administration of medicinal cannabis and cannabinoids. however, after the present in vitro validation clinical tests are required to confirm the efficiency of vaporizers as therapeutic application tools. "

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article...ne.0147286

arizer solo..το βαπόρι με τις περισσότερες πωλήσεις σε όλο το κόσμο ...
μάλλον όχι τυχαίο γεγονός ...   
ποιό volcano ;
:d

"the highest recoveries were obtained with arizer solo®, namely 67.5–82.7%. no differences were seen between thc and cbd. except for cbd vaporized from cannabis (rsd = 11.6%) the variability was small with rsd values typically being < 8%. only a minor portion of ≤ 3% of the cannabinoids remained in the residue after vaporization of cannabis and no cannabinoids were found in the piece of cotton used to vaporize the cannabinoid standards. additional 9.8%– 13.6% of thctot and cbdtot were adsorbed onto the glass tube and the sample chamber of the device, resulting in an overall recovery of 79.0–98.1%. the sum of the cannabinoids found in the various fractions was highest for thc vaporized from cannabis and reached 88.9% in cbd-type and 98.1% in thc-type cannabis. the relatively simple design of the device consisting of smooth surfaces and inert materials such as metal and glass may be responsible for the high yield."


εντάξει,ναι οι ατμοί των arizer air & solo ενδέχεται να είναι κάπως "καυτοί" ...διά κάποιους ασθενείς ...
αλλά τα βαπόρια αυτά είναι από τα πιο αποτελεσματικά στην ατμοποίηση και διάθεση κανναβινοειδών ...
(του διάσημου volcano πάντως ,του "ρίχνουν στ' αυτιά" ...)
ότι πρέπει δηλαδή, διά κάποιους άλλους " ασθενείς " ...
:p